- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Noob question - travelling
- Decro
- Topic Author
- New Member
-
I’m flying to another province this weekend and I wanna take a half bottle of MHR (I have a half because I take 1 instead of 2). Will this be an issue or should I rather leave it? Or pull the label off? I’m not in the middle of a cycle, wanted to start on 1 December. I don’t wanna somehow get caught...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- admin
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 5070
- Thank you received: 2547
MHR's label does not tell you that it contains anabolics, but I still won't transport it with the original label, some idiot in Durban did just that a few weeks ago with roids and was caught at the airport and everything was confiscated and he was detained for a few hours. Not sure if a SAPS case was opened.
I actually think the idea of underground labs using labels that broadcast the actual contents of a product is stupid, they should place fake labels on the product. The appearance of a product should not matter, but apparently it does because the prettier the packaging the "more legit" uneducated people think the product is. I know of countless cases where a fake label would have saved someone's ass.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LesDoctor
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 165
- Thank you received: 101
Orals are easy to smuggle, you just empty a vitamin Bottle and put the tablets in the vitamin bottle.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- admin
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 5070
- Thank you received: 2547
LesDoctor wrote: probably not the brightest idea however I'm sure they have more important things to do than to stop someone with a used vial of Testosterone Cypionate.
No, that's a stupid idea and they don't have more important things to do. They gave the guy that was stopped in Durban a few weeks ago a considerable amount of shit and he ratted out his supplier without hesitation.
EDIT: And you are a medical doctor, so obviously you won't have a hard time explaining why you travel with AAS but the average guy without a prescription will have some explaining to do.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- admin
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 5070
- Thank you received: 2547
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LesDoctor
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 165
- Thank you received: 101
admin wrote:
LesDoctor wrote: probably not the brightest idea however I'm sure they have more important things to do than to stop someone with a used vial of Testosterone Cypionate.
No, that's a stupid idea and they don't have more important things to do. They gave the guy that was stopped in Durban a few weeks ago a considerable amount of shit and he ratted out his supplier without hesitation.
Airport security was developed in attempt to make the traveller feel safer and fails dismally to protect those on the flight.
The TSA in America is quite honestly pointless. Pointless to the extent where the TSA actually admits to it. They missed 95.7% of guns in a Screening test ( edition.cnn.com/2015/06/01/politics/tsa-...ort-screening-tests/ ). This is America also, Imagine how effective it must be here. :silly: . Gear is most likely not as obvious to detect.
I just don't think is reasonable to say Corona is not dangerous, however, travwelling with gear is eventhough for both cases we have stats that prove that neither is as dangerous as common opinion may be.
I wonder how many times the guy travelling to durban or people in general travelling to durban have been there with no hassles. Does not seem as common as you try to portray.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- admin
-
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 5070
- Thank you received: 2547
LesDoctor wrote: Airport security was developed in attempt to make the traveller feel safer and fails dismally to protect those on the flight.
The TSA in America is quite honestly pointless. Pointless to the extent where the TSA actually admits to it. They missed 95.7% of guns in a Screening test ( edition.cnn.com/2015/06/01/politics/tsa-...ort-screening-tests/ ). This is America also, Imagine how effective it must be here. :silly: . Gear is most likely not as obvious to detect.
It's not about detecting it through screening, but rather through manual searching. You might get away with it 50 times, before they get you once and then you'll regret not disguising it better.
I never said it's obvious to detect with screening.
LesDoctor wrote: I just don't think is reasonable to say Corona is not dangerous, however, travwelling with gear is eventhough for both cases we have stats that prove that neither is as dangerous as common opinion may be.
Corona is NOT dangerous, [removed, because I shouldn’t be rude]. I did not say it's common to be caught with gear when traveling, but why be stupid and risk it. I'm saying that it's fucking stupid not to disguise your gear as a precautionary measure.
LesDoctor wrote: I wonder how many times the guy travelling to durban or people in general travelling to durban have been there with no hassles. Does not seem as common as you try to portray.
Many times they travel without issues, I never said it's common to get caught. Read properly. I'm saying that you should take preventative measures if you get stopped. The guy I'm taking about didn't and he was shitting himself when interrogated and spilled the beans and ratted out his supplier. Don't be that guy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- LesDoctor
-
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 165
- Thank you received: 101
My comment was comparing the fear of being caught with gear to that of the fear of suffering deliritous effects from the corona virus. I stated how both are as irrational as eachother. I did not support the fear mongering of the virus.
Obviously there is only things to gain from disguising it, so why not do it.
Perhaps I misunderstood. I thought your mentioning of the guy who got caught was to deter those to travel with gear. My apologies.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Decro
- Topic Author
- New Member
-
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
admin wrote: Ship it to your destination or place the capsules into a vitamin bottle.
MHR's label does not tell you that it contains anabolics, but I still won't transport it with the original label, some idiot in Durban did just that a few weeks ago with roids and was caught at the airport and everything was confiscated and he was detained for a few hours. Not sure if a SAPS case was opened.
I actually think the idea of underground labs using labels that broadcast the actual contents of a product is stupid, they should place fake labels on the product. The appearance of a product should not matter, but apparently it does because the prettier the packaging the "more legit" uneducated people think the product is. I know of countless cases where a fake label would have saved someone's ass.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.