OK, first things first...the thread title is meant to provoke some discussion. I'm not sold on the idea of "prolactin induced gyno" but I'd like to hear people's explanations of this and find out where they are getting their info from. And I realize that this should probably be in the science section, but I think a lot of people don't look there and more people here will hopefully get something out of this.
Statements about "prolactin induced gyno" often appear in discussions about "progestins" and "progesterone gyno." I feel that there is a lot of confusion about these two hormones and how they relate to gyno formation. I'd like to try to give my perspective on this and why I feel these are incorrect, or at least too simplistic explanations for the potential of a given compound to cause gyno symptoms.
I'm going to start with a discussion of progesterone and "progestins" and then talk a bit about prolactin. Hopefully all this will stimulate a good discussion. Like I said above, I'd like to hear where people are getting their info on "progestin gyno" and "prolactin gyno."
What does progesterone do?
In women, progesterone has multiple roles during pregnancy It causes changes in uterine tissue necessary for implantation and aids in the development of the breast ductal system in preparation for lactation.
Progesterone is a key precursor and steroidogenic intermediate for all bioactive natural steroids and the progesterone receptors A and B are structurally and evolutionarily the closest members of the nuclear receptor superfamily to the androgen receptor. Yet, although progesterone has crucial gestational and lactational roles in female reproductive physiology, it has no well established role in male reproductive physiology apart from a possible role in sperm function (234), possibly via non-genomic rather than a classically genomic mechanism (235). Nevertheless functional nuclear progesterone receptors are expressed in male brain, smooth muscle and reproductive, but not most non-reproductive tissues (236). Synthetic progestins, steroidal structural agonistic analogs of progesterone, are potent inhibitors of pituitary gonadotropin secretion used widely for female contraception and hormonal treatment of disorders such as endometriosis, uterine myoma and mastalgia. Used alone, progestins suppress spermatogenesis but cause androgen deficiency including impotence (237, 238) so androgen replacement is necessary. Non-human primate studies indicate that this is mediated via a central hypothalamic-pituitary site of action rather than direct effects on the testis (239).
endotext.com/male/male15/maleframe15.htm
Other effects we are interested in:
1) Antagonism of 5alpha-reductase. One theory is that progesterone competes with testosterone for binding to 5a-R. This would reduce the conversion of T to DHT and thus lower DHT levels. In males, this can be considered a "feminizing effect."
2) Elevates SHBG levels. SHBG binds to testosterone much better than to estrogen. Therefore, increased SHBG levels will decrease free test levels faster than free estrogen. This will create a transient imbalance in the free (active) T/E ratio. (On a side note, this difference in affinity for SHBG also means that estrogen can be released from SHBG "more easily" than test by supplements that are meant to interfere with test-SHBG interactions).
3) Can be converted to androstenedione, which can then be converted to estradiol. Increased levels of progesterone could lead to increased circulating estrogen.
4) In men, excess progesterone can rapidly shut down the HPTA.
5) Down-regulate or up-regulate ER expression? (Haven't found a clear answer to this yet, but it is an important question)
What is a progestin?
From my experience, on this and other boards you can find lots of references to such and such steroid/prosteroid/prohormone being a "progestin" and thus a string of warnings for people to watch out for gyno (which isn't a bad warning under any circumstances, really). However, many of these compounds, at least from what I can tell, are not, in fact progestins, at least in a strictly chemical sense. Here's Patrick Arnold talking about progestins:
most of these componunds people are calling progestins are not really progestins. they share vague chemical similarity with known pharmaceutical progestins and maybe have slight progestational activity but in my expert opinion would NOT fall into the category of progestin. they would be considered in the androgen class.
case in point would be estra-4,9-dien-3,17-dione
[a] "progestin is something that has progestational activity. but the complicated thing is most androgens have a certain degree of progestational activity (albeit minor for most)
its really a subjective call. certainly something like norethindrone from birth control pills can be considered a progestin (even though it has substantial androgenic activity). and then norethandrolone would be considered an androgen (even though it is very close in structure to norethindrone and has substantial progestational activity)
then there is the chemical aspect of what is a progestin
there are two classes of progestins - the C20-keto progestins such as classic progesterone and its derivatives, and the 17alpha-ethynyl estren derivatives such as norethindrone and norgestrel
i would think anything that is not in these structural classes would not be considered a progestin by an authority in this field. the only supplement i am aware of that fit this definition was the stuff that was in the old methyl-1-p (which was a C20-keto derivative)"
So as you can see, one problem is that while most of these compounds cannot be chemically classified as progestins, it is, as PA said, possible that some of them (or some of their metabolites) may have some level of activity at the progesterone receptor. I, for one, would like to see such info for many of these compounds, but I doubt that I could scour PubMed for the next year and be able to compile a halfway decent chart of "compounds and their metabolites that may or may not have progestational activity (that may or may not lead to gyno)."
I feel that for discussion's sake, when talking about compounds we should try to know whether they are progestins or androgens with some progestational activity. For example, nandrolone supposedly is able to activate the PR (progest. receptor) about 1/5th as well as progesterone itself, whereas trenbolone is closer equal activation. Neither of these compounds can be chemically classified as progestins, yet have substantial progestational activity.
Gynecomastia?
Almost 25% of all cases of gynaecomastia are currently classified as idiopathic. In this group of patients, circulating sex hormones, SHBG and gonadotrophins are within reference limits. The development of gynaecomastia is attributed to an altered tissue response which may be due to reduction in androgen receptors (75) and/or a local increase in aromatase activity in the breast.(46) Reduction in androgen receptors may be congenital or induced by drugs.
Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 38: 596-607
The effects of progesterone listed above, namely reduced levels of DHT and elevated SHBG may be integral to any role in gyno formation.
Here's another quote that I think is relevant (but I don't know the original source) talks about the contribution of DHT levels:
"In addition to elevated IGF-1, lowered DHT levels resulting from endogenous testosterone suppression may contribute to gyno from non aromatizing steroids. Gyno is a reported side effect from finasteride use. Some have attributed this to elevated estrogen levels due to the fact that there is more testosterone to be aromatized, since less test is being converted to DHT. Other researches think that DHT has a direct antiestrogenic effect on breast tissue.
Studies have shown that DHT can actually block estrogen from binding to the estrogen receptor in mammary tissue (1). DHT also is an aromatase inhibitor (2). Even more interesting is the fact that transdermal DHT cream has been used successfully to treat gyno (3).
It may be that the estrogen/DHT ratio is more important to the development of gyno than the estrogen/testosterone ratio."
So what may be happening is:
1) Progestin/progesterone ---> increased progesterone receptor signaling (which leads to) --> increased IGF-1 expression ----> stimulation of alveolar hyperplasia (not sure exactly how much this contributes to gyno)
2) Progestin/progesterone ---> increased progesterone receptor signaling--> lowered DHT levels ---> decreased antiestrogenic DHT activity in breast tissue = decreased DHT block of estrogen receptors in breast AND decreased DHT anti-aromatase activity in breast
The question that must be asked for each individual androgen is how much relative progestational activity does it have.
For example if nandrolone blocks DHT formation more so than trenbolone, but trenbolone elevates SHBG more than nandrolone, the relative importance of these effects will determine which compound is more likely to lead to gyno. By most accounts, nandrolone is more effective at this (especially when combined with test, which likely results in elevated estrogen at the same time), suggesting that the effects on DHT are more critical.
Prolactin
Where does prolactin come into this? Prolactin is a pituitary hormone that causes lactation. During pregnancy, it is the combined rise in estrogen and progesterone that contributes to prolactin production, i.e. progesterone causes development of the gland, and estrogen causes accumulation of prolactin that will eventually cause secretions (both of which probably depend on GH and IGF-1 signaling). In women, the drop in estrogen and progesterone after birth basically releases a hold on prolactin induced milk secretion. Here, estrogen and progesterone suppress lactation until after the baby is born; then levels of E and P drop off and prolactin takes over.
Is there a similar thing happening in men taking progestational androgens? In this case it might be that increased E and progestational signaling (if you're on a suppressive compound that also acts on the progesterone receptor) causes gyno formation (and increased prolactin levels), and then when you stop the compound and go into PCT (loss of E and progestational signaling), lactation is possible.
In men,
In general, an increase in effective oestrogen/androgen ratio, irrespective of the cause, may actually stimulate prolactin release and increase circulating concentrations.
Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 38: 596-607
and
www.endotext.org/male/male14/male14.htm
Prolactin stimulates epithelial cell proliferation only in the presence of estrogen and enhances lobulo-alveolar differentiation only with concomitant progesterone.
and with regard to gyno:
Although prolactin receptors have been demonstrated in breast tissue, including gynecomastia [19], hyperprolactinemia probably plays an indirect role in gynecomastia by causing central hypogonadism. Most men with gynecomastia do not have elevated serum prolactin levels, and not all men with hyperprolactinemia develop gynecomastia. Nevertheless, it has been shown in cultured breast cancer cells that prolactin and sex steroid receptors (especially the progesterone receptor [PgR]) may be coexpressed and may cross-regulate each other?s expression [20,21]; acute prolactin treatment produced an increase in PgR and a decrease in AR content. If this were to occur in the breast tissue of hyperprolactinemic men, the resulting increase in PgR expression and decrease in AR expression could promote breast tissue growth and result in gynecomastia.
[19] Gill S, Peston D, Vonderhaar BK, et al. Expression of prolactin receptors in normal, benign, and malignant breast tissue: an immunohistological study. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:956?60.
[20] Ormandy CJ, Hall RE, Manning DL, et al. Coexpression and cross-regulation of the prolactin and sex steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82(11): 3692?9.
[21] Gutzman JH, Miller KK, Schuler LA. Endogenous human prolactin and not exogenous human prolactin induces estrogen receptor a and prolactin receptor expression and increases estrogen responsiveness in breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004;88:69?77.
from: Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am (2007) 36: 497?519
While prolactin and progestins on their own don't seem to cause gyno, is it possible that something similar to the post-pregnancy lactation in women could happen in men taking progestational androgens? In this case it might be that increased E and progestational signaling (if you're on a suppressive compound that also acts on the progesterone receptor) causes gyno formation (and increased prolactin levels), and then when you stop the compound and go into PCT (loss of E and progestational signaling), lactation is possible.
(continued below)
tilebreaker
06-22-2008, 01:54 PM
This is an important excerpt from an article by Karl Hoffman that I believe sums up a lot of the issues here:
PROGESTERONE AND PROLACTIN INDUCED GYNECOMASTIA
Before delving into this subject, I'd like to say first and foremost, that in users of anabolic/androgenic steroids (AAS) the first step in combating the development of gynecomastia, or male breast enlargement, is to eliminate the causative agent: the anabolic steroid. Drug-induced gynecomastia almost invariably resolves on its own when a person quits taking the drugs responsible for it, if caught before permanent fibrosis develops. Unfortunately, most AAS users don't want to employ this simple approach, for obvious reasons, so the foregoing will all be under the assumption that a person wants to prevent or treat gyno and still continue steroid use.
In the belief that certain anabolic steroids increase prolactin levels as well as act as agonists at the progesterone receptor, some have advocated the use of antiprolactin agents, like bromocriptine, or progesterone receptor blockers like RU-486 to treat AAS related gynecomastia, in lieu of more traditional drugs like tamoxifen.
In truth, the etiology of gynecomastia is unknown and a number of agents including estrogens, progestins, GH, IGF-1, and prolactin may be involved. However, most authorities believe that a decreased (T+DHT)/E ratio is central to the development of gyno, and that blocking the effects of estrogen, or increasing T + DHT levels, is central to ameliorating the problem.
Regarding prolactin, androgens decrease prolactin levels whereas estrogens increase prolactin. Non-aromatizing androgens have never been shown to elevate prolactin levels in humans, but testosterone has, due to its aromatization to estradiol (19). Prolactin secreting tumors, or prolactinomas, are often associated with gyno. But in these cases the prolactin is believed to induce gyno by suppressing testosterone production: "Prolactinomas that are sufficiently large to cause gynecomastia do so as a result of impairment of gonadotropin secretion and secondary hypogonadism" (20). However, this is a moot issue in AAS users whose gonadotropin secretion is already blunted.
According to research cited in (20), prolactin may have a direct stimulatory effect on mammary tissue development, but only in the presence of high estrogen levels.
The presence of mild hyperprolactinaemia is therefore not uncommon in patients with estrogen excess. Significant primary hyperprolactinaemia, on the other hand, may directly stimulate epithelial cell proliferation in an estrogen-primed breast, causing epithelial cell proliferation and gynaecomastia.
So rather than focusing solely on lowering prolactin levels which may be elevated in users of aromatizing androgens, attacking estrogen should be the first line of action.
GH and IGF-1 are considered critical to the proliferation of mammary tissue. An excellent review of the role played by these hormones, as well as a general overview of gynecomastia can be found here: [lost link; possibly
www.endotext.org/male/male14/male14.htm
Since elevated GH and IGF-1 are considered important to the anabolic effect of AAS, it would be impractical and counterproductive to attempt to prevent gynecomastia by blocking GH/IGF.
Progesterone acts in concert with estrogen to promote breast development, and at least part of any role played by synthetic progestins may be to stimulate IGF-1 production in the breast. But again, blocking the action of progesterone or synthetic progestins is not practical. Specific progesterone receptor antagonists like RU-486 block not only the progesterone receptor, but the androgen receptor as well, and have actually been associated with the development of gynecomastia (21). In any case, progesterone is thought to act on the breast to enhance the effects of estrogen (22) so once again, attacking estrogen is the easiest and most logical approach.
DHT gel (Andractim) or a generic knockoff might help as well. DHT is thought to act as an aromatase inhibitor (23) and perhaps compete directly with estrogen for binding at the estrogen receptor (24). DHT has been used in several case reports and controlled trials to successfully treat gynecomastia. So perhaps a viable strategy would be to combine DHT gel with tamoxifen. I would recommend tamoxifen rather than an aromatase inhibitor due to the simple fact that tamoxifen has been widely used in numerous controlled studies to succesfully treat gynecomastia, whereas the evidence to support the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors is scanty at best.
(19) Nicoletti I, Filipponi P, Fedeli L, Ambrosi F, Gregorini G, Santeusanio F
Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1984 Feb;105(2):167-72
(20) Ismail AA, Barth JH.Ann Clin Biochem 2001 Nov;38(Pt 6):596-607
(21) Grunberg SM, Weiss MH, Spitz IM, Ahmadi J, Sadun A, Russell CA, Lucci L, Stevenson LL J Neurosurg 1991 Jun;74(6):861-6
(22) Nomura K, Suzuki H, Saji M, Horiba N, Ujihara M, Tsushima T, Demura H, Shizume K
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988 Jan;66(1):230-2
(23) Perel E, Stolee KH, Kharlip L, Blackstein ME, Killinger DW
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1984 Mar;58(3):467-72
(24) Casey RW, Wilson JD.
J Clin Invest 1984 Dec;74(6):2272-8
www.mindandmuscle.net/articles/karl_hoffman/myths
Conclusions:
It seems that all the problems that come with increased progestational activity may require high estrogen to become really noticable...so if you can stop the estrogen (on cycle or during the "rebound"), you should have a good chance of avoiding the progestational sides...that's my theory from my reading, anyway.
And finally, prolactin does NOT cause gyno (well, only in extremely rare cases) in most PH/DS/AAS users. It can cause lactation if gyno (generally caused by low T/E ratio, i.e. low T, high E; increased progestational activity is also involved) has progressed to the point where the ductal systems are more developed and prolactin levels have risen enough to trigger lactation. Increased prolactin and subsequent lactation is a side effect of gyno, not a cause.
More info on general male and female endocrinology:
endotext.com/male/index.htm
endotext.com/female/index.htm