LGD-4033 from Liquid-Pharma

LP is launching their LGD-4033 soon.

I don't have much details on it yet, but it's happening. I'll post once I have more details.

For those that don't know, LGD-4033 is a SARM similar to Ostarine and RAD140. LGD-4033 seems to be the stronger of all the SARMs currently available.

I have been anxiously waiting for this. Fantastic news.

Hey guys, any advice on lenght of cycle? Been doing a bit of reading and although LP released this in pill form, some say sarms are only available in liquid form. Tried prohormones before and didnt like the crash afterwards, especially the libido. Here is one of the articals referring to sarms only to be in liquid form. For me LP's products were always legit. www.isarms.com/forums/steroids-sarms-inf...lgd-4033-a-7199.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Catfury wrote: Hey guys, any advice on lenght of cycle? Been doing a bit of reading and although LP released this in pill form, some say sarms are only available in liquid form. Tried prohormones before and didnt like the crash afterwards, especially the libido. Here is one of the articals referring to sarms only to be in liquid form. For me LP's products were always legit. www.isarms.com/forums/steroids-sarms-inf...lgd-4033-a-7199.html

We've discussed this "only in liquid" crap before: www.anabolicsteroids.co.za/forum/6-stero...rma?start=125#210007

Here is my quote from the thread above:

admin wrote:

Littletweep wrote: How about Ostarine from LP, is it in capsule form or liquid. Because I keep on hearing that if it is not in in liquid then it's not Ostarine.

LP Ostarine is in capsule form. Stop listening to idiots, you can place it in capsule, tablet or liquid there is absolutely no reason why it should be in liquid form to be legit.

My guess is that you are hearing this crap on US forums.

Indeed it was on overseas form, now since that is sorted, any advice on cycle lenght?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Remember there is a loophole in the US law that makes it legal to sell drugs for research purposes as long as it is sold in liquid form and not for human consumption.

This loophole doesn't exist in SA, so there is no reason why LP have to put SARMs in a liquid only, they can make it in any form they want as it won't make a difference here.

It's ok to read US forums to get an idea on the usage of these drugs, but they have no clue what happens in the rest of the world and just because SARMs are usually found in liquid form over there doesn't mean the rest of the world is the same.

Catfury wrote: Indeed it was on overseas form, now since that is sorted, any advice on cycle lenght?

The cycle can be as long as you want it to be as far as I know.

Thank you very much for the reply, it makes sense. Was thinking of a six to eight week cycle, thanks again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have read quite a lot and on different forums on darm cycle reports most guys report that gains slow down to virtually not being worth it past week 12 on most sarms so I would say run 8-12weeks

Thank you,


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think 8 weeks was a good period, worked well for me. I do recommend that one does a mini PCT even if it is just a test booster, the stuff is quite suppressive.

and yeah the whole "SARMS have to be in liquid form" is bull, it is only preached by greasy snakes like Dylan Gemelli. I used capsules and they worked great.

Mad Cow - did you use as a bridge or SARMS only cycle?

@Romeo LGD only, haven't touched AAS before.

So far I can confirm an hour workout is easy, I have to get out the gym because my time is up, not because I actually want to leave.

Thanks Pump.

How long have you been on?

I'm not sure, around 2 weeks? Also dropping a ton of body fat, but working with Empire on my diet, so a combo of the two.

Hey guys, so i have read guys recommending LGD and GW as a nice stack.

Any comments? Pro's/cons? So far none found and would just like some input from my trusted peeps in SA.

Plan is to run LGD for 8 weeks (might extend to 12) along side GW for 12 weeks.
Was thinking of following with a PCT1 however i just read madcow recommends a test booster. Does LGS suppress enought that the PCT 1 would be better?

Run PCT 1 to be safe, or do bloods and know for sure.

Hey bud,

It's a decent stack and I'm pretty sure you'll be happy with the results. I am currently running those along with RAD and I'm loving it.

If you can, run the LGD for 12 weeks at 10mg per day. I definitely recommend running PCT 1. It is suppressive (not very but it is..)

If your budget allows run the GW for 16 weeks (you can run it through your PCT)

thanks Pump and Ninja.

@ninja, was thinking of running this stack for 12 weeks and then run a 8 week test prop cycle next year. Thereafter will repeat with another sarm stack like this?

To my understanding the LGD will give nice muscle gains while the GW keeps my endurance and fat burning in check.

Hoosain wrote: thanks Pump and Ninja.

@ninja, was thinking of running this stack for 12 weeks and then run a 8 week test prop cycle next year. Thereafter will repeat with another sarm stack like this?

To my understanding the LGD will give nice muscle gains while the GW keeps my endurance and fat burning in check.

I find huge endurance with just the LGD I have not used the GW for long enough to comment on the comparison, but I was running both together for awhile.

00pump wrote:

Hoosain wrote: thanks Pump and Ninja.

@ninja, was thinking of running this stack for 12 weeks and then run a 8 week test prop cycle next year. Thereafter will repeat with another sarm stack like this?

To my understanding the LGD will give nice muscle gains while the GW keeps my endurance and fat burning in check.

I find huge endurance with just the LGD I have not used the GW for long enough to comment on the comparison, but I was running both together for awhile.

Thanks pump the endurance is quite a big thing for me.
Kinda stoked that i got you replying on this as well. I find your cycles most in line with what i want. Steady lean gains without hitting the more hectic compounds while still keeping it safe to avoid nasty sides.

EDIT: not taking anything away from the other guys with the awesome advice

Hoosain wrote:

00pump wrote:

Hoosain wrote: thanks Pump and Ninja.

@ninja, was thinking of running this stack for 12 weeks and then run a 8 week test prop cycle next year. Thereafter will repeat with another sarm stack like this?

To my understanding the LGD will give nice muscle gains while the GW keeps my endurance and fat burning in check.

I find huge endurance with just the LGD I have not used the GW for long enough to comment on the comparison, but I was running both together for awhile.

Thanks pump the endurance is quite a big thing for me.
Kinda stoked that i got you replying on this as well. I find your cycles most in line with what i want. Steady lean gains without hitting the more hectic compounds while still keeping it safe to avoid nasty sides.

EDIT: not taking anything away from the other guys with the awesome advice

I'm a noob with regards to SARMS, but I'm really enjoying them and I don't see myself stopping using them any time soon. I will just keep switching them up...

Hi guys,

I'm new to this forum but have been lurking around for a while now.

Have any of you given LGD-4033 from LP a go? If so, what was your experience in terms of gains, supression, sides, etc? I'm asking this since I'm in the process of getting some to run solo.

I've read mixed reviews about LGD in general when it comes to supression; some claim none, others claim mild, whilst others swear it shut them down completely. I've come to the conclusion that everyone reacts differently to it, but generally it's only mildly supressive and most guys who were completely shut down (and got gyno), may have gotten PHs labelled as LGD from shady sources. I've read about one guy claimming he gained 15 lbs from LGD in 4 weeks, but was completely shut down; I doubt he was using real LGD.

I plan to run it for 8 - 12 weeks at 10 mg a day. I chose 10 mg due to the fact that most guys recommend it and also since LP only manufactures 10 mg caps. On most forums they suggest running it for 8 weeks, but a couple of guys recommend 12 weeks, so if everything goes smoothly I'll push for 12; any thoughts on this?

I plant to go for PCT1, even if I don't feel any adverse effects after completing the cycle.

Any comments, advice and guidance would be much appreciated!