CEE First Published Study

  • MxT
  • Topic Author
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
16 Oct 2007 23:50 #211 by MxT
CEE First Published Study was created by MxT
Guys this is the firt published study on Creatine EE. In sumation it is crap. Will you get effects YES. Is it better than Creatine MH -NO. And at the recomended 2-3 grams once a day dosage taking this study into incorporation-it is a scam as a lot of us has been saying over the last 2 years. This holds truefor ALL forms of creatine until PROVEN by formal published studies. DOnt fall for the companies marketing hype. Use good old creatine Monohyddrate-if you feel you want to venture out and try something new- Keep your eyes on products with Beta-Analine- EAS Phosphagen Elite comes to mind. Lots of studies on BA and they are all positive.

Creatine Ethyl-Ester Unstable, Say Researchers
New research shows that creatine ethyl-ester - a new but unproven version of the popular sports supplement creatine – does not work as well as regular creatine.

One of the most effective supplements for anyone who wants to boost their gym performance, creatine monohydrate is used regularly by athletes, bodybuilders and regular gym-goers. But while many companies have released different versions of creatine, which are supposed to work better than the standard product, very few of these new supplements have been studied in properly controlled clinical trials.

This latest research, conducted by a team of British scientists and presented at the 4th International Society of Sports Nutrition (ISSN) annual meeting in Las Vegas, is one of the first studies to put creatine ethyl-ester to the test.

Researchers Dr. Robert Child and Dr. Mark J Tallon compared two products containing creatine ethyl-ester with creatine monohydrate. Despite advertising claims to the contrary, Child and Tallon found that creatine ethyl-ester was actually less stable than regular creatine.

\"We found that the addition of the ethyl group to creatine actually reduces acid stability and accelerates its breakdown to creatinine,\" says Tallon. \"This substantially reduces creatine availability in its esterified form, which makes creatine ethyl-ester inferior to creatine monohydrate as a source of creatine.\"

\"To date, no published study has shown that creatine ethyl-ester works any better than regular creatine,\" adds study co-author Dr. Robert Child. \"In fact, our work shows that it’s less stable. Anyone should think twice about spending their money on this type of product.\"

Source
Child, R. & Tallon, M.J. (2007). Creatine ethyl ester rapidly degrades to creatinine in stomach acid. International Society of Sports Nutrition 4th Annual Meeting

No Preservatives. 100% Juice

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
17 Oct 2007 14:04 #212 by admin
Replied by admin on topic CEE First Published Study
Good read; personally I don't know why every second person make such a bid deal about creatine. It does absolutely nothing for me, at least I don't notice anything.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Mr K
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
17 Oct 2007 22:40 #213 by Mr K
Replied by Mr K on topic CEE First Published Study
Hey Admin , maybe you’re a non-responder which is the case with some people. Just the way the body works , some people get great results out of something and others get nothing. Also if your on gear its difficult to see the results of supplements. Natural guys tend to respond better to supplements than non. Difficult to gauge the strength increase of creatine when your comparing it to anadrol J

Mx-t woke me up to this CEE junk a while back when I though it was the best thing out. Tired it and got heartburn and that was about it. I like the way supplement companies say “Yeah it keeps you nice and lean , solid gains with no water retention” Water retention is a good indication the creatine is actually working for you and probably one of its most anabolic properties. Im looking forward to more of this research coming out and I personally think these companies should be held accountable and hopefully it will wake a lot of people up…

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
18 Oct 2007 02:40 #214 by admin
Replied by admin on topic CEE First Published Study
Kevin Coyne wrote:

Hey Admin , maybe you’re a non-responder which is the case with some people. Just the way the body works , some people get great results out of something and others get nothing. Also if your on gear its difficult to see the results of supplements. Natural guys tend to respond better to supplements than non. Difficult to gauge the strength increase of creatine when your comparing it to anadrol J


Yeah, I guess you have a point there. :unsure:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum