Barbell wrote:Hi Inja, thanks so much for your input. Your wisdom and intimate knowledge of everything is appreciated and I am forever in debt for you taking the time to correct my somewhat average attempts at learning however I am somewhat mystified as to why you seem to lack the reading capabilities of a entry level primary school learner. I clearly agreed with Beesting as I clearly said "True"...
Well no, actually you didn’t agree with Beesting, you said:
true...technicaly speaking...they are amino acids but because their structure has a branch off the main trunk of the molecule they called BCAA`s. I think they also help with the processing of the rest of the aa`s
This is what Beesting was telling you is complete bullocks. See, there is nothing wrong with researching and then posting up your information for everyone to benefit. But if you are going to post something as fact, at least have the 'initiative' to first check whether the information you have is accurate. Then, when someone corrects you (as Beesting did), instead of talking more bollocks in an attempt to back your original bollocks story up, rather go back and double check your information. So that you know the information you are giving is correct.
P.S. Why are you telling me about cysteine? I was merely informing you that cystine is not an amino acid but rather just a name given to two dimerised cysteines.
