Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
19 Feb 2016 06:38 #196653 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

lobo wrote: When I said its not the gear I meant that there is nothing wrong with it in the sense that It wasn't made poperly...


How do you know? UG labs fuck up all the time.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Ravage
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
19 Feb 2016 09:06 #196656 by Ravage
Replied by Ravage on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
@ Admin....Hang on a minute UG's make fk up??? So that means im a test guinea pig?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
19 Feb 2016 09:28 #196657 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

Ravage wrote: @ Admin....Hang on a minute UG's make fk up??? So that means im a test guinea pig?


Yes, don't tell me you didn't know that underground means it's not made under controlled pharmaceutical standards.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • VXM
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
19 Feb 2016 09:57 #196658 by VXM
Replied by VXM on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

admin wrote:

VXM wrote: So far as anyone on this forum knowing anything about me....that would concern me. So far as I am aware I do not know of anyone that posts here irl and I am sure most people would like to keep it that way. ;)


Nobody knows anything about you, that's precisely the point I was making by asking lobo a rhetorical question.


I know, guess I just got carried away in my response there, I can ramble for no reason on a good day. :P

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lobo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
19 Feb 2016 18:46 #196690 by lobo
Replied by lobo on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
Hard to believe that a UGL that have been manufacturing for just over two decades or any other that has been in the business for a long time makes fuck ups all the time if they do which is possible in anything the percentage is low would think goods labs have measures in place to keep thier products at a certain standard would be in thier interest. Shitty labs or kitchen cooks I can understand that happening regularly.

If there is a legitimate problem with vmxs gear he should contact them to my knowlegde they will sort it out.

Admin I am simply giving an answer to your question the way I see it if im wrong pls correct me.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
19 Feb 2016 20:12 - 19 Feb 2016 20:16 #196693 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
What's your association with this lab?

I didn't know this Ciccone has been on the market for over 20 years or were they rebranded recently?
Last edit: 19 Feb 2016 20:16 by admin.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Oupa

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
19 Feb 2016 20:23 #196694 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
Isn't Ciccone just re-branded Namad Labs?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lobo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
19 Feb 2016 22:19 #196695 by lobo
Replied by lobo on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
No association with them other than a few dealings, the guys involved with the brand have been in the steroid business for that time ciccone is meant to be a sister company of nomad thats as much as I know about them.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • admin
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
20 Feb 2016 11:53 - 20 Feb 2016 11:58 #196697 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

lobo wrote: No association with them other than a few dealings, the guys involved with the brand have been in the steroid business for that time ciccone is meant to be a sister company of nomad thats as much as I know about them.


Sister company is just a fancy way of saying that the same factory produces them or they are owned by the same people.

Thing is that I understand enough of the politics to see why a name change was needed. Nomad has lost popularity over the last couple of years, but one thing they still have to their advantage is a very solid distribution network and when you have that in place you risk very little with a re-branding of your product. Basically the Nomad distribution network is their most powerful asset and far more valuable than the Nomad name.

Re-branding of Nomad to Ciccone makes perfect sense because they can start fresh without the stigma of poor quality attached to the Nomad brand and because they already have the distribution network it's a very painless process to promote the "new" brand. It could also be that new partners got involved and that required a "new" brand so that Nomad and Ciccone can be distinguished, but I'm just guessing and don't give a shit about their management.

What I do care about is that the forum is used/abused to promote a brand as something new and wonderful when it's just an old wolf in sheep's clothing.

lobo, I'm not accusing you of any wrong doing, but had to ask what your involvement is. For someone with no association with them other than a few dealings you came across as very determined to keep their name in the clear. The irony is that getting a few knobs from injecting a high dose testosterone product is not considered a sign of inferior quality and is not something that will hurt the brand in any way whatsoever. A good brand will promote itself and any effort to artificially create hype around it will just cause it to backfire, I know I've seen it happen before.
Last edit: 20 Feb 2016 11:58 by admin.
The following user(s) said Thank You: p1et, Oupa, Rooi Bul 86, Lemmiwinks95

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lobo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
20 Feb 2016 19:45 #196703 by lobo
Replied by lobo on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
Completely understand where you coming from Admin I would feel the same way if I was in your position its your forum and I respect the way you want it to be run. I haven't been involved in the steriod scene in south africa to know much about the workings of it so its interesting to learn a bit about whats happening.

Im glad its been cleared up, enjoy been a member here and would like to keep doing so, learnt a shit load from you guys and continue to. also wouldn't want to be worring about yourself and oupa coming looking for me...haha

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Eidolon
  • Expert
  • Expert
More
22 Feb 2016 01:52 #196718 by Eidolon
Replied by Eidolon on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

lobo wrote: Completely understand where you coming from Admin I would feel the same way if I was in your position its your forum and I respect the way you want it to be run. I haven't been involved in the steriod scene in south africa to know much about the workings of it so its interesting to learn a bit about whats happening.

Im glad its been cleared up, enjoy been a member here and would like to keep doing so, learnt a shit load from you guys and continue to. also wouldn't want to be worring about yourself and oupa coming looking for me...haha

Thanks


Mate, not to harp on about this, but the fact that you've used a certain product without PIP or negative reaction does not mean it applies to everyone else. Even if the product is completely sterile, people react differently to the carrier oils, such as GSO, MCT or EO. Also, people have different tollerances to BA levels.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Oupa

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • lobo
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
22 Feb 2016 10:17 #196729 by lobo
Replied by lobo on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
Was mentioned a few posts back

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Eidolon
  • Expert
  • Expert
More
22 Feb 2016 11:24 #196743 by Eidolon
Replied by Eidolon on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?

lobo wrote: Was mentioned a few posts back


There you go then. A local lab I know recently switched over their whole range from GSO to MCT because lots of users reported PIP :ohmy:

On top of that, it's hard to QC all the raws from China. Even the best UGLs sometimes get burned, but what sets them apart is that they're prepared to set things right.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • THEEBull
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
27 Feb 2016 11:41 #196847 by THEEBull
Replied by THEEBull on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
A dealer at our gym started pushing this Ciccone
like crazy and therefore I don't trust it that much,
because that just means largest markup.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Tmuscle
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
02 Mar 2016 16:59 #196914 by Tmuscle
Replied by Tmuscle on topic Ciccone, what's the general consensus?
Am currently using there Winston and results are impressive although could also be the deca taking serious effect 12 weeks into 20 week cycle

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Powered by Kunena Forum